Who owns nss labs

Investments 1. NSS Labs General Information Description Provider of a fact-based cybersecurity guidance intended to advance transparency and accountability within the cybersecurity industry.

Ownership Status. Privately Held backing. Financing Status. Formerly PE-Backed. Primary Industry. IT Consulting and Outsourcing. Other Industries. Network Management Software. Primary Office. What you see here scratches the surface Request a free trial. Want to dig into this profile? Request a free trial. NSS Labs Comparisons. HQ Location. Total Raised. Post Valuation. Last Financing Details. Provider of a fact-based cybersecurity guidance intended to advance transparency and accountability within the cybersecu.

Austin, TX. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat. Bethesda, MD. Denver, CO. Add Comparison. NSS Labs Competitors NSS Labs Patents. NSS Labs Signals. Growth Rate 0. Weekly Growth 0. Size Multiple x Median. Key Data Points Twitter Followers 5. The top cloud providers have done a good job of building in security into the public and hybrid clouds they offer.

However, it is the responsibility of the enterprise to secure the data and applications running in each cloud instance, especially those that are internet facing.

Businesses must determine what their security needs are when it comes to cloud deployments and then layer in security controls, depending on what they must protect.

For example, healthcare providers working with cloud applications must be compliant with HIPAA privacy regulations to ensure patient data in the cloud is kept safe. To confirm that each security measure deployed will work as advertised, many of these organisations rely on third-party testing, validation and certification. This is, of course, applicable to all industries who are adopting cloud computing and handle sensitive data. As the migration to cloud continues to accelerate, enterprises require third-party validation to make well-informed choices when selecting cloud security tools and providers, in a similar fashion to how they have historically compared and contrasted network equipment vendors.

Enterprises embracing hybrid clouds have the additional challenge of needing to understand the capabilities of both security appliances and controls deployed in their private infrastructure, as well as virtual security appliances and tools deployed in the cloud.

Many enterprises have relied on NSS Labs for traditional network security infrastructure validation and now they need a similar capability that extends to the cloud. In any case, while security testing and validation is getting more complex, the community, including the MEF and NetSecOpen, is up to the task.

Just as the network equipment vendors have proactively come together to support community-based standards, the cloud providers and security vendors have a responsibility to their customers to participate in open, transparent and third-party validation initiatives. Luckily, many of the traditional network and security equipment manufacturers are already actively engaged in cloud security discussions via NetSecOpen and MEF, so gaining industry participation in community-based standards for cloud aligns well with their portfolio expansions to service the cloud market.

As a leader in testing, validation, and open community standards, Spirent is urging the technology community to come together and participate in community-driven industry best practices and open standards. Together, we can hold each other accountable as we move toward a more secure network and cloud ecosystem.